Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> (I'm not finding it right now, but I'm pretty sure that the SUS > >> specifies that numeric userid == 0 for superuser, whereas "root" is not > >> required to be the name, so this would be more correct anyway.) > > > Can we assume 'id' is on all unix systems? > > What's your point? The script fails anyway if that bit doesn't work.
Is 'id' better than what we have now if 'id' isn't widely supported? -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
