Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Luke Lonergan wrote:
Tom,
On 3/17/06 9:59 PM, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This would buy what exactly?
I guess you didn't read the other 80% of the post.
In short, faster performance through more aggressive runtime
compilation. A
JIT for the database kernel. It's not like I'm on shaky ground here -
other
commercial DBMS have done it for over a decade.
In exactly a fortnight from today, I'll repost my suggestion to rewrite
the backend in Java ;-)
Please do! we haven't seen this suggestion for quite a while, I'm
starting to miss it...
Regards,
Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
