Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
Any particular reason why straight CVS doesn't work for you? Are you
that interested in having the log comment locally?
Personally, I'd really like to have a local repository copy, because
I spend a *lot* of time with cvsweb etc --- but I'm sure my needs are
several standard deviations away from the mean. So far I've been
discouraged from setting up a repository by the unreasonable
infrastructure needs of cvsup. So these alternatives do sound pretty
interesting.
Is csup protocol-compatible with cvsup? If so people could use it
without Marc having to do anything. Has anyone got experience with
it --- reliability, performance, etc?
Tom,
I don't know what unreasonable infrastructure you are referring to.
Building cvsup is a major pain, but installing and running it isn't, in
my experience. There's a package in Fedora Extras. Setting up cvsweb
against my cvsup repo is a fine idea - I wonder why I didn't think of that.
That's not to say that supporting cvsync isn't a good idea too.
TIMTOWTDI as we perl people like to say.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
