"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane said:
>> What does it mean to have different "default" encoding conversions in
>> different schemas? Even if this had a sensible interpretation, I don't
>> think the existing code implements it properly.
> perhaps I'm misunderstanding, but why not just resolve the namespace at the
> time the default conversion is created?
Isn't that the same thing as saying that there can only be one default
conversion across all schemas? ("Only one" for a given source and
target encoding pair, of course.) If it isn't the same, please explain
more clearly.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
