Myron,

First, this sounds really good!

On 4/8/06 9:54 PM, "Myron Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  I added a little hack to the buffer
> code to force
> pages read into the buffer to stay at the back of the free buffer list
> until the master
> thread has had a chance to use it.

This is the part I'm curious about - is this using the shared_buffers region
in a circular buffer fashion to store pre-fetched pages?

One thing I've wondered about is: how much memory is required to get
efficient overlap?  Did you find that you had to tune the amount of buffer
memory to get the performance to work out?

- Luke



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to