I'm wondering who is responsible for ECPG since there appear to be a number questionable statements which may or may not be bugs. Do we have a resident expert?
Examples: src/interfaces/ecpg/ecpglib/execute.c line 871 To my untrained eye it looks like after the first time through the loop it's going to double-free nval. src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/numeric.c line 364 A numeric is allocated but leaked if set_var_from_str fails. src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c line 169 Again, memory leak if risnull fails Yes, these are from the coverity report. Who knows enough about ECPG to decide what's a real bug and what's just bad assumptions? -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
