On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:21:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > AFAIK, everything that is in exports.txt was put there for a reason. > I'm happy with the situation as it stands (other than wanting to enforce > the exports.txt restriction on more platforms ...)
In that case, shouldn't we add to libpq-fe.h all the functions that libpq is exporting? > Did we come to a decision about whether to implement symbol versioning > for libpq? Not really. For distributors it's nice because it means that they don't need to recompile the entire software stack just because a new postgres release enters the archive. But for run-of-the-mill users who compile postgres themselves, they won't notice one way or the other. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
