On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:02:02PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > > Why can PLs not handle pseudo-types? > > > >No one's done the work to figure out which ones are sensible to > >support and then add the logic needed to support them. > > > PL/Java will handle the RECORD type correctly. I'm just finalizing a > new, more flexible, type mapping implementation for PL/Java and it > would be easy to add support for more pseudo types too. But what > others would make sense?
Ideally, some way to get all kinds of user-defined types. DOMAINs, too. :) Cheers, D -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
