On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:31:52PM +0200, Mario Weilguni wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 10:59 schrieb Peter Eisentraut: > > Am Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 10:10 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout: > > > You want to make a GUC that makes: > > > > > > BEGIN; > > > BEGIN; > > > > > > Leave you with an aborted transaction? That seems like a singularly > > > useless feature... > > > > If a command doesn't do what it is supposed to do, then it should be an > > error. That seems like a throroughly useful feature to me. > > Maybe. I just want to emphasize that it will break existing applications.
If the existing application is trying to start a new transaction from within an existing one, I'd say it's already broken and we're just hiding that fact. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
