On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:37:34PM -0400, Douglas McNaught wrote: > "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:55:43AM -0500, Hogan, James F. Jr. wrote: > >> Only specific tables. > >> > >> Of the 150 plus existing there are only 8 or 10 that hold sensitive > >> data. > > > > In that case I'd definately go with the suggestion of creating access > > functions and logging to a table from within them. Just make sure to > > mark the functions as volatile. > > But what if the user calls the access function, sees the data, then > issues a ROLLBACK? The audit record would be rolled back as well (as > Tom pointed out earlier). > > You could use dblink to log to a separate audit database, I suppose.
Ooops, forgot about that. Yeah, you'd have to use dblink. If it works with pgpool performance might not be too horrid. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
