"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Perhaps it would be best to add a seperate set of functions that use > boyer-moore, and reference them in appropriate places in the > documentation. Unless someone has a better idea on how we can find out > what people are actually doing in the field...
You've obviously missed the point of my concern, which is code bloat. A parallel set of functions incorporating B-M would make things worse not better from that standpoint. (Unless you are proposing that someone do it as a separate pgfoundry project; which'd be fine with me. I'm just concerned about how much we buy into as core features.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org