Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe it would be better to set attislocal=0 if the attinhcount goes from
> 0->1?

That just moves the surprises to other cases.  I think I'd prefer to err
in the direction that can't cause unexpected data loss (due to columns
being dropped that perhaps should not have been).

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to