On Jun 11, 2006, at 14:45 , Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:18:11 +0900,
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Time (and timestamp) is a bit of a issue conceptually. The "default"
successor function would depend on the precision of the timestamp.
And in the ideal case it doesn't exist. That is why I think a
closed, open
interval is a better way to go.
How would you go about converting a closed-open representation to a
closed-closed representation for display purposes? Or inserting data
that is provided in closed-closed representation?
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
