Tom Lane wrote:
> The latter seems seriously grotty: it forces the user to remember an


> I propose that we change the syntax to be
>       WITH OIDS
>       | WITHOUT OIDS
>       | WITH (definition)
>       | /*EMPTY*/
> and say that if you want to specify both OIDS and another option you
> have to write "oids" or "oids=false" in the definition list.
> This gets rid of the hazard that someone might try to specify
> conflicting oids options in the hardwired part of the syntax and
> in the definition list, and lets the hardwired syntax be deprecated
> and perhaps someday removed.
> Any objections?

Sounds good.

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to