ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In particular, this is useful for oracle users. Oracle recommends to use
> NUMBER(n, p) for all the case where numerics are required. So they try to
> use NUMERIC on PostgreSQL instead of NUMBER. But NUMERIC is not the best
> alternative to a short integer NUMBER.
I think the correct answer to that is user education. Anything along
the lines you are suggesting would be convoluted and would probably
introduce unexpected behaviors (eg, overflow of intermediate results
that wouldn't have overflowed if the data was really NUMERIC).
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
