On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 12:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I've now thought about how to fix that without doing that rather crude > > rsync-pg_xlog-hack. > > I've read through the code, and learned that wal-segments are expected to > > have a specific size - > > thus rotating them "early" is not that easy. > > Simon was working on a patch for this at the code sprint; I think it's > submitted to -patches already.
Advertising
Slightly different patch. I'm working on this one still. > Explicitly filling the segment as you > propose would be really bad for performance. Yes, current approach I am taking is better than that. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
