On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 12:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've now thought about how to fix that without doing that rather crude 
> > rsync-pg_xlog-hack.
> > I've read through the code, and learned that wal-segments are expected to 
> > have a specific size -
> > thus rotating them "early" is not that easy.
> Simon was working on a patch for this at the code sprint; I think it's
> submitted to -patches already.  

Slightly different patch. I'm working on this one still.

> Explicitly filling the segment as you
> propose would be really bad for performance.

Yes, current approach I am taking is better than that.

  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to