On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 22:55 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Is it intentional that effective_cache_size is a real (as opposed to > integer)? The initial revision of guc.c already has it that way, so it > was probably blindly adapted from the previous adhockery that had all > planner variables be doubles.
Makes no sense to me as a real. It should be an integer, since it is the effective number of cache pages, not KB, MB or GB. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
