Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This has been shot down many times before, and the arguments you are 
>> presenting are not new.

> Has there been a solution found for the arguments/issues. Is there any
> history about why at some point we decided to enforce the security
> option?

Read the list archives ...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to