On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 11:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Where are we on these TODO items:
> >
> > > o Allow point-in-time recovery to archive partially filled
> > > write-ahead logs [pitr]
> >
> > I believe we'd agreed that the necessary infrastructure for this is
> > just a function to tell the current WAL segment name and offset.
>
> Yes, perhaps, though I can envision a GUC that does regularly partial
> archiving. I will add a question mark to the item.
I was planning to add a new GUC
archive_timeout (integer) = max # secs between log file switches
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
