Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maybe we need to try to stress test the comparison routines a bit to
make sure they really are deterministic.
Eyeball inspection shows that cube_cmp is wrong: it's doing
PG_RETURN_INT16 where it should say PG_RETURN_INT32.
ouch, good catch!
As best I can tell, the committed expected file is actually wrong.
I'm going to patch both cube.out and cube_1.out to match what I
get after fixing the function, and we'll see where that takes us.
I notice that cube_2.out hasn't been updated. Was that intentional?
Well, I was going to wait to see a buildfarm member that needed the
alternative exponent representation, and use the regression diff as a
template
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
