Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> > > It's not particularly clear to me. On its face this seems to me to imply 
> > > something about how the index will be able to be used, not about how it 
> > > is to be built.
> > 
> > Yea, that was always a confusion.  CREATE CONCURRENT INDEX has the same
> > problem.  We need something that talks about the build-time behavior. 
> 
> How about
> 
> CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY?

Yea, that actually sounds pretty good.  Though a new keyword, it might
be the best solution.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to