Andrew Hammond wrote: > How about "what works with a given release at the time of the > release"?
We just threw that idea out in the context of the procedural language discussion because we do not have the resources to check what works. > Arguably, neither are most of the procedural languages in the Server > Programming section of the documentation, and yet they're included. That is false. The documentation documents exactly those pieces of code that we distribute. > "There are a number of different approaches to solving the problem of > replication, each with strengths and weaknesses. As a result, there > are a number of different replication solutions available for > PostgreSQL. To find out more, please refer to the website." Well, that's what I've been talking about all along, and it has also been the resolution at the Toronto meeting. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
