On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 03:05:02PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 4. August 2006 04:50 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > I'd like to see us refactor the docs as necessary to reflect that
> > idea. Peter is right that this needs some discussion in
> > syntax.sgml as well as in the reference pages --- but I'm still
> > not very clear on how the presentation should go.
>
> I'm beginning to think that VALUES might be a separate command after
> all.
What's below definitely bolsters that idea :)
postgres=# VALUES(1);
column1
---------
1
(1 row)
However, there are some oddities:
postgres=# SELECT * FROM (VALUES (1,2)) AS foo(bar,baz);
bar | baz
-----+-----
1 | 2
(1 row)
postgres=# (VALUES (1,2)) AS foo(bar,baz);
ERROR: syntax error at or near "AS"
LINE 1: (VALUES (1,2)) AS foo(bar,baz);
Does the SQL standard have anything to say about assigning identifiers
both to the entire VALUES() statement and to its columns when the
VALUES() statement is by itself?
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
