On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 18:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> BTW, is anyone up for renaming the existing "preload_libraries" > variable > >> to "postmaster_load_libraries"? This would be more symmetrical > with > >> "backend_load_libraries", and so perhaps clearer about which does > what > > > Makes sense to me, of course that breaks existing postgresql.conf > files. > > We already broke them by removing the init-function name...
How about: shared_load_libraries (rather than postmaster_load_libraries) local_load_libraries (rather than backend_load_libraries) which is more informative for people that don't know/care what a postmaster or a backend is and what implications those phrases carry. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
