Do we want to enable a ICU build option in 8.2?


Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:55:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Fine for you, not so fine for other people with different concerns.
> > 
> > I'm not unsympathetic to your general point, but black-and-white
> > arguments won't get far in this discussion.  It's all about tradeoffs
> > ... it's most definitely not about one-size-fits-all.
> What I find most confusing is that the patch for adding ICU to postgres
> (using a configure switch) has been around for a while, at one point it
> was even in the queue for 8.2:
> It's vanished from there, not sure why. Even so, we still get regular
> requests for it. Presumably it was removed here:
> Given the patch does nothing if you don't enable it, I'm not quite sure
> what the downsides would be...
> Have a nice day,
> -- 
> Martijn van Oosterhout   <>
> > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to 
> > litigate.
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to