Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Yeah, that's better wording. Or more correct I think "Windows 2000 > > SP4 or above". > > > > FWIW, MS has officially said at some point that they will not make > > SP5 for Windows 2000, but they've changed their minds before... > > Unless there actually is a version of that operating system that is not > labelled "Windows 2000 SP4" that is supported, this expression is > meaningless. > > Note that the list of "supported" platforms in the documentation does > not make any open interval claims (or any interval claims for that > matter). > > If you know that anything before Windows 2000 SP4 is unsupported, that > would be useful information, but not the other way around.
I see who mentions of Win2000, one in the FAQ, another in the release notes. If people want the text changed, I want an example showing exactly what the new wording should be because you can't just add "and later" into the text we have now. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
