Robert Treat wrote: > On Thursday 17 August 2006 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me > > > either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to > > > revert to the old way? > > > > Since almost the first day I hacked on PostgreSQL I have been filtering > > both lists into the same folder, so they pretty much appear to be one > > and the same to me anyway. > > I'm curious, do you combine any other lists like that? I've played around > with that idea (for example, I used to combine webmaster emails, pgsql-www, > and -slaves emails but the slaves traffic was too high so I had to split it > back out). As someone subscribed to a good dozen pg lists, I've always been > quite amazed how much email some of the folks here manage to process... I > suppose I could just chalk it up to a pine vs. gui thing, but I suspect there > are some other tricks people have to make emails more manageable (anyone > combine all pg mail to one folder?)
Yes, all mine are in one folder, and I use elm ME. It is faster than a GUI email client. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
