Hi, > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Tuesday 22 August 2006 16:10, Tom Lane wrote: >>> As I see it, we've effectively got a patch that was rejected once, >>> and Bruce wants to apply it anyway because no replacement has been >>> forthcoming. > >> Well, unless someone is going to commit to doing it the other way, it >> seems >> the guy who actually codes something offers a better solution than >> handwaving... people have also had plenty of time to come up with a >> replacement if that's what they really wanted. > > The patch submitter has neither provided an updated patch nor defended > his original submission as being the right thing. If he doesn't take it > seriously enough to have done any followup, why should the rest of us? > > At the moment, with the online-index and updatable-views patches both > pretty seriously broken, and no sign that the bitmap-index people are > awake at all, I might take it on myself to fix this one instead of those > others. But is that what I should be spending my time on in the waning > days of the 8.2 freeze cycle? Speak now or hold your peace. > > regards, tom lane
I am willing to get it up to shape and support both COPY (select) TO and COPY view TO, the second is rewritten as SELECT * FROM view. In fact, I already started. Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
