> > Is it not possible to brute force this adding an AM method to insert
> > without the uniqueness check? > > Hm. Actually there already is a feature of aminsert to allow > suppressing the unique check, but I'm not sure whether using > it for RECENTLY_DEAD tuples helps. Seems like we have to > wait to see whether DELETE_IN_PROGRESS deleters commit in any case. Um, but if we wait for the DELETE_IN_PROGRESS tuple, after the wait we can add it eighter with or without the unique check (depending on commit/abort). Then at least we don't need to wait in a 3rd pass for readers ? Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster