Robert Treat wrote: > On Saturday 02 September 2006 11:42, Tom Lane wrote: > > BTW, another "output" thing you might consider is "having draft release > > notes ready-to-go on demand". Currently, Bruce prepares the release > > notes on the basis of a very tedious scan of the CVS commit logs. > > If this sort of stuff were being dropped into a tracker as it went > > into the CVS tree, at least the research part of making the notes would > > be zero-effort (or perhaps better to say that the work would be spread > > out instead of concentrated). > > FWIW I have never understood why we don't require patch submitters/committers > to update the release notes when they do the patch. I know Bruce says that > it's not a problem for him to do it, but it sure would help out some of the > other folks.
I can't even get documentation for many patches. I am hesitant to add even more burden. I would prefer they concentrate on documentation. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
