Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Both createuser and vacuumdb provide the same feedback as the 
> >> corresponding SQL commands.
> >> 
> >> The more I think about it, the patch that just went in is an outright 
> >> mistake.
> > Well, we had a lot of discussion when this patch was posted, and seveal
> > people liked it.  I need someone else to say they want it reverted.
> I agree with Peter: that patch is a quick hack not a considered solution.
> As for "several people said they liked it", where?  I don't see even
> one followup to

The issue is that the patch was at the end of a thread, and no one said
they didn't like it, and no one said anything when it was placed in the
patch queue.  I take that as acceptance.

But now that two people do not like it, patch reverted.

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to