On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:06:02AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > There's a lot of duplicate code in ecpg. > > No kidding :-(. The parser is bad enough but the datatype library is > an order of magnitude worse. I don't have a great solution at hand > though. The backend utils/adt/ code gets to rely on the backend's
Neither have I. > error handling and memory management protocols, which I surely do > not propose to remove, but how could we keep common sources when > ecpglib has to work in a far less friendly environment? We could modify the backend code to use pgtypeslib, but that would cost at least a little bit of performance I would guess. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
