On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:06:02AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There's a lot of duplicate code in ecpg.
> No kidding :-(.  The parser is bad enough but the datatype library is 
> an order of magnitude worse.  I don't have a great solution at hand
> though.  The backend utils/adt/ code gets to rely on the backend's

Neither have I.

> error handling and memory management protocols, which I surely do
> not propose to remove, but how could we keep common sources when
> ecpglib has to work in a far less friendly environment?

We could modify the backend code to use pgtypeslib, but that would cost
at least a little bit of performance I would guess.

Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to