On 2006-09-05, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right, I see the pgfoundry project as just a backwards-compatibility
> thing for anyone who doesn't want to change their code.  I'm happy to
> put some cleaned-up functions into core right now (ie, for 8.2) if
> someone will do the legwork to define and implement them.

So you're prepared to violate the feature freeze to stick in a new API
that nobody currently wants to _use_, while forcing existing users to
resort to pgfoundry for a module that's been around for several major

Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to