On 2006-09-05, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, I see the pgfoundry project as just a backwards-compatibility > thing for anyone who doesn't want to change their code. I'm happy to > put some cleaned-up functions into core right now (ie, for 8.2) if > someone will do the legwork to define and implement them.
So you're prepared to violate the feature freeze to stick in a new API that nobody currently wants to _use_, while forcing existing users to resort to pgfoundry for a module that's been around for several major releases? -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
