Gregory Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Also Heikki points out here that it would be nice to allow for the case 
> >> for a
> >> 0-byte header.
> >
> > I don't think there's enough code space for that; at least not compared
> > to its use case.
> Well it's irrelevant if we add a special data type to handle CHAR(1).

In that case you should probably be using "char" ...

Alvaro Herrera                      
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to