Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> My memory is lousy at the best of times, but when have we had a minor >> release that would have broken this due to changed format? OTOH, the >> Primary and Backup servers need the same config settings (e.g. >> --enable-integer-datetimes), architecture, compiler, etc, do they not? >> Probably working from an identical set of binaries would be ideal. > > Not often, which is why I mention the possibility of having > interoperating minor release levels at all. If it was common, I'd just > put a blanket warning on doing that.
I don't know that it's happened in the past but I wouldn't be surprised. Consider that the bug being fixed in the point release may well be a bug in WAL log formatting. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
