Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > >> My memory says this was eventually removed, even though it was committed > >> for a time. Am I wrong? > >> - Make EXPLAIN sampling smarter, to avoid excessive sampling delay > >> (Martijn van Oosterhout) > > > I see a reversion for EXPLAIN ANALYZE only: > > > date: 2006/06/09 19:30:56; author: tgl; state: Exp; lines: +27 -172 > > Revert sampling patch for EXPLAIN ANALYZE; it turns out to be too > > unreliable because node timing is much less predictable than the patch > > expects. I kept the API change for InstrStopNode, however. > > > so the item is probably still OK. > > No, Simon is right, that entry should be removed --- there's nothing > interesting left of the patch :-(
I see. Removed. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
