On 9/18/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> yes, i can explain it in detail, and am willing to kick in some
> documentation.

Ah-hah, you're on the hook for docs then ;-).

sure no problem.  the prototypes you suggested are imo the way to go,
with two small considerations:

is it worth considering using the  oid type instead of int4 since the
'locktag' fields are unsigned?
also, the userlocks raised a warning if you tried to release a
non-existing lock.  should that stay or go?

As far as the PR material goes, something like "advisory locks
incorporated into core" would be OK, but don't make it sound like
there was nothing there before ...

ok, thats a good compromise.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to