[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have the impression I'm not being heard. > > *I* control the MAC address assignment for all of *MY* units.
No, you're missing the point. How does that help *me* avoid collisions with your UUIDs? UUIDs are supposed to be unique period, not just unique on your database. If all you want is unique number generation in your database then you can just use sequences and they'll take a lot less space and perform much better. (16-byte foreign keys throughout the whole database, *shudder*) The reason to use UUIDs is when you want to have unique identifiers that you can send outside the database and know they won't conflict with other unique identifiers generated elsewhere. Really this whole debate only reinforces the point that there isn't a single way of doing UUID generation. There are multiple libraries out there each with pros and cons. It makes more sense to have multiple pgfoundry UUID generating modules. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly