Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Strangely, if I try to do a "cvs add gram.c", it fails with > cvs add: `gram.c' added independently by second party > I don't know what this means. (Why "second party" and not "third > party"?). Even if I delete gram.c. Even if I remove it from > .cvsignore.
I think "cvs add" probably contacts the server, because I seem to recall that it gives different output depending on whether the file already exists on another branch, and there's no way to tell that from your local working directory contents. The CVS history for gram.c looks a bit confused: http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/parser/Attic/gram.c How did revisions 2.89 and 2.90 come into existence when the file was already cvs-removed? This may be confusing the server too. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
