Jim C. Nasby wrote:
In addition to/instead of abstracting cmin/cmax to a phantom ID, what about allowing for two versions of the tuple header, one with cid info and one without? That would allow for cid info to be stripped out when pages were written to disk.
How exactly would that help? You can't just strip out cid info when writing to disk, if you don't want to lose the information.
And it's certainly a lot more complicated than the phantom id thing. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
