> > Oh, I just got the email from Magnus which says do not use v2.1, > but > > 1.875, so I guess that's what I did wrong. Oops! > > Certainly not --- we work with both of those (I have 1.875 on one > of my devel machines and 2.1 on two others). In fact, your diff > says you have > 2.1 on the failing machine and 2.2 on the working one, which got my > attention because I didn't know there was a 2.2. > > Right at the moment I'm not seeing what's significant in your diff > and what's just incidental to 2.1-vs-2.2 coding changes and > Windows-vs-Linux \n vs \r\n newline discrepancies. I'm about outta > steam for tonight... > anyone else want to look closely?
Well, it *does* break with 2.1 on win32-native. Could be something simple, could be that it's just generating msvc-incompatible code. I didn't look into the details, I tried the older version and then it worked :-) Never realliy had the time to look into the details of why it was failing. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
