On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
"Sergey E. Koposov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Just the test on IA64 (Itanium2, 1.6Ghz, 8Gb memory). The results seem to
be quite different:
What libc are you using exactly? Can you try it with the unrolled
strlcpy I posted?
glibc 2.3.5 , gcc 3.4.4
my results were obtained already with your unrolled version (but when I
first ran it with the 'default' strlcpy the results were the same).
In glibc-2.4.90, there seem to be out-of-line assembly code
implementations of strncpy for: sparc64 sparc32 s390x s390 alpha ia64
and an inlined assembler version for i386. So the x86_64 case is
nearly the only popular architecture that doesn't seem to have
a hand-hacked implementation ... which throws some doubt on Mark's and
my results as possibly not being very representative.
Regards,
Sergey
*******************************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy/Sternberg Astronomical Institute
Tel: +49-6221-528-349
Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
