"Mark Woodward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Not to cause any arguments, but this is sort a standard discussion that > gets brought up periodically and I was wondering if there has been any > "softening" of the attitudes against an "in place" upgrade, or movement to > not having to dump and restore for upgrades.
Whenever someone actually writes a pg_upgrade, we'll institute a policy to restrict changes it can't handle. But until we have a credible upgrade tool it's pointless to make any such restriction. ("Credible" means "able to handle system catalog restructurings", IMHO --- without that, you'd not have any improvement over the current rules for minor releases.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly