Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it be reasonable to include one more switch: 'include
> dependencies' ?

We are two months past feature freeze ... adding entirely new features
to pg_dump is *not* on the table for 8.2.  What we need to do at the
moment is make sure that the features we've got work sanely and won't
create headaches for likely future extensions; but not actually
implement those extensions.

> The scenario I most care about is to be able to make a complete data
> base dump (including non-schema objects) while excluding only a few
> tables.

Isn't this the same as Kris' complaint?  Why do you need additional
dependency analysis to do the above?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to