Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I found the function I used before I implemented the C version.  It was
> significantly slower, which is why I wrote the C version.

I would imagine that most of the problem is the NUMERIC arithmetic
that's doing.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to