Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I found the function I used before I implemented the C version. It was > significantly slower, which is why I wrote the C version.
I would imagine that most of the problem is the NUMERIC arithmetic
that's doing.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
