Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 07:14:36AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:26:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > Funny, sounds like what I usually do. I welcome the assistance. > > > > Well, yes, that was my impression too. The complaint in the thread > > that started all this, as I understood it, was that there were big, > > hairy features that tended to have long discussions about them, and > > very few people among even the committers seemed to have a clear idea > > of exactly where things stood at the end of coding. > > Something else that would be helpful is summarizing discussions that > don't result in code (perhaps on the developer wiki). That way if > someone wants to see the history of something they don't have to wade > through the list archives just to have some idea of what's being talked > about. This is probably especially important when the discussion results > in some design ideas/proposals but never moves forward from there.
What I started to do for this is to add the thread URL to the TODO item it relates to. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
