Shane Ambler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> None of this avoids the cost of query planning, or query execution.
> No but you can avoid costly disk access and still have the postgres
> level of integrity and integration that memcached doesn't offer.
If you're just trying to cache data, it's not clear what you are doing
that the shared buffer cache and/or kernel-level disk cache doesn't
do already.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
