Shane Ambler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> None of this avoids the cost of query planning, or query execution.

> No but you can avoid costly disk access and still have the postgres 
> level of integrity and integration that memcached doesn't offer.

If you're just trying to cache data, it's not clear what you are doing
that the shared buffer cache and/or kernel-level disk cache doesn't
do already.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to