"George Pavlov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmm. If the messages are less than PIPE_BUF bytes long (4096 bytes on
>> Linux) then the writes are supposed to be atomic.
> Some of them involve long messages (>4K), but there are many that do not
> (like the ones I had posted at the start of this thread).
I checked around with some kernel/glibc gurus in Red Hat, and the
consensus seemed to be that we'd be better off to bypass fprintf() and
just send message strings to stderr using write() --- ie, instead of
elog.c doing
fprintf(stderr, "%s", buf.data);
do
write(fileno(stderr), buf.data, strlen(buf.data));
Anyone have any comments on possible portability risks? In particular,
will this work on Windows?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
