[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
>> Presumably those are just the standard warnings we can't easiy
>> eliminate. If not, can you post them please?
> They all appear harmless.
The reason those "uninitialized variable" warnings got away from us is
that gcc doesn't emit them at -O2 or below, so most of us never saw 'em
before. I've cleaned them up.
The "find_rule" gripe is really a flex bug :-( ... not easy to avoid.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
