Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joachim Wieland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Current beta seems to have the 2006k version of the zic database. The 
> > current
> > zic database is version 2006n however. Since this update does not include
> > source code but just data files I would vote to do the update in beta, what
> > do others think?
> 
> Sigh, I just updated that six weeks ago ...

Tom has done the zic updates to 2006n.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to